← Home
Fixtures  ›  Pro League  ›  Al Okhdood
Pro League

Al Okhdood Predictions

AI-powered match predictions, accuracy tracking, and bookmaker consensus comparisons.

Total Predictions
5
0 upcoming · 5 settled
Result Accuracy
60%
3 / 5 correct
BTTS Hit Rate
60%
3 / 5 calls
Over 2.5 Hit Rate
60%
3 / 5 calls

📊 Past Predictions (latest 5)

Sat 16 May 2026
0–2
3–1

Al Okhdood stunned Al Khaleej Saihat 3-1 in a result that defied virtually every pre-match indicator our model had identified. A penalty conversion from C. Bassogog in the 13th minute gave the hosts an early lead, but J. King's well-taken finish just five minutes later restored parity and seemed to confirm the expected trajectory. Instead, Al Okhdood seized control after the interval. Bassogog's assist helped K. Narey restore the lead in the 59th minute, and a late goal from A. Al Hatila in the 90+4th minute sealed a convincing victory that sent Al Khaleej Saihat home empty-handed.

Our prediction of a 0-2 away win was decisively wrong. The model had weighted overwhelming emphasis on Al Okhdood's catastrophic offensive record (0.47 goals per game) and their psychological disadvantage as a relegated side with nothing to play for. We flagged their defensive vulnerability—conceding 2.28 per game—but underestimated the possibility that motivation and tactical focus could override historical form, particularly against an opponent who, despite mid-table status and superior recent head-to-head record, failed to impose themselves when it mattered. The H2H data suggested Al Khaleej Saihat's dominance in this fixture, yet they couldn't translate expected patterns into sustained pressure or clinical finishing.

What this result illustrates is the inherent limitation of relying heavily on aggregated performance metrics when psychological factors—survival instinct, tactical adjustments, individual match intensity—can shift outcomes in ways raw averages cannot fully capture. Al Okhdood's actual performance departed sharply from their underlying numbers, a reminder that regression to the mean is a tendency, not a guarantee.

Tue 12 May 2026
1–0
0–0

Al Kholood and Al Okhdood served up a goalless stalemate on Saturday, a result that confounded the pre-match expectation of a narrow home victory. Our model had predicted a 1-0 scoreline favoring Al Kholood with 54% win probability, but the attacking impotence on display—particularly from the visitors—meant neither side could find the breakthrough.

The prediction missed the mark on result direction, though the underlying logic wasn't entirely misplaced. Al Okhdood's relegation status and historically poor attacking output of 0.65 goals per game did materialize as a genuine constraint on their threat level. What our analysis underestimated was Al Kholood's vulnerability in converting chances at home, despite averaging 1.17 goals in their own stadium. The hosts' defensive frailties, flagged at 2.04 conceded per game, remained intact—they simply weren't breached. The low expected goals total of 1.78 identified in pre-match analysis proved prescient; the match developed as a attritional affair with neither team generating sufficient quality to break the deadlock.

The draw represents a missed opportunity for Al Kholood, who held clear motivation advantages and superiority in the head-to-head record. For Al Okhdood, the point offers nothing material given their mathematical relegation, though it does represent a minor salvage operation defensively. Our model's lean toward Under 2.5 goals and skepticism around both teams scoring proved accurate in spirit, even if the exact scoreline eluded prediction. In a fixture where marginal differences in execution typically decide outcomes, Saturday demonstrated how fine those margins truly are.

Sun 3 May 2026
3–0
4–0

Al-Ahli Jeddah dismantled Al Okhdood with a dominant 4-0 victory that unfolded almost entirely in the first half. Vinicius Atangana broke the deadlock in the 26th minute with assistance from Salem Abu Al Shamat, before Frank Kessie's clinical finishing twice in quick succession—at 36 and 43 minutes—gave Al-Ahli a commanding 3-0 lead at the interval. The match effectively ended when Al Okhdood's Hussain Al Zabdani was sent off just before halftime, leaving the visitors to navigate 45 minutes with ten men. Al Buraikan added a fourth in the 72nd minute from Ricardo Mathias's assist, sealing a comprehensive result that reflected the gulf in quality between the two sides.

Our model predicted a 3-0 scoreline with 91 percent confidence in an Al-Ahli win, and while we called the result direction correctly, the final margin exceeded our expectation. The prediction's foundation proved sound: Al-Ahli's dominance at home and Al Okhdood's defensive fragility were well-flagged beforehand. The visitors' form had been deteriorating sharply—averaging just 0.8 goals conceded per game—and their away record painted a particularly bleak picture. What we slightly underestimated was the visitor's collapse once reduced to ten men, which compressed Al-Ahli's attacking space into something almost clinical rather than contested.

The match served as a practical illustration of the gap between top-four aspirants and relegation-form opponents. Al-Ahli's movement in the first half was purposeful and efficient, converting opportunities that reflected their home-ground advantage and tactical clarity. For Al Okhdood, the sending off compounded an already impossible task against a team hunting a top-two finish. The 4-0 result sits comfortably within the realm of what the underlying matchup dynamics suggested.

Thu 30 Apr 2026
0–1
1–3

Al-Ettifaq's rest advantage and superior pedigree proved decisive as they dismantled Al Okhdood 3-1 in a match that unfolded almost exactly as the underlying dynamics suggested. Medran opened the scoring in the 45th minute, giving the visitors a halftime lead that reflected their dominance. Al Okhdood briefly threatened an upset when Pedroza equalized in the 60th with assistance from Narey, but the respite proved temporary. Al Ghannam restored Al-Ettifaq's advantage in the 74th minute, and Wijnaldum sealed the outcome four minutes later to complete a commanding second-half performance that stretched the final margin to two goals.

Our model predicted a 0-1 victory for Al-Ettifaq and correctly identified the winner, though the actual scoreline deviated significantly. The prediction rested on several well-flagged factors: Al-Ettifaq's 15-day rest advantage against Al Okhdood's seven-day turnaround, the visitors' historical dominance in the head-to-head record, and Al Okhdood's chronic struggles at home (averaging just 0.7 goals across their last five fixtures). What we missed was the magnitude of Al Okhdood's vulnerability once breached—their inability to maintain defensive structure after Medran's opener allowed Al-Ettifaq to accumulate goals rather than defend a slender margin. The form disparity proved more pronounced than a simple one-goal margin suggested.

The match validated our emphasis on the rest and motivation gap between the sides, yet underestimated Al-Ettifaq's capacity to convert their advantages into multiple goals once their gameplan gained traction. Al Okhdood's brief leveling moment offered false hope in what became a comfortable away victory.

Thu 23 Apr 2026
1–0
2–0

Damac secured a decisive 2-0 victory over Al Okhdood in a match that followed the familiar script of their recent encounters. Arielson opened the scoring in the 18th minute with assistance from V. Vada, establishing early control. The home side's grip on the contest never loosened, and Vada himself sealed the result in the 88th minute to confirm three comfortable points.

Our pre-match prediction correctly identified Damac as the likely winner, though the final scoreline deviated from expectations. The model had forecast a 1-0 outcome with 42% confidence in a Damac victory, but the visitors proved unable to sustain the defensive discipline required to maintain parity. Al Okhdood's away form—averaging 2.1 goals conceded—was always a concern, and they failed to trouble Damac's goalkeeper despite reasonable chances to register a shot on target. The head-to-head pattern we'd highlighted proved partially predictive: Damac's last five meetings with this opponent had averaged exactly 2.0 goals, and their tendency toward low-scoring, dominant performances remained evident here.

Where the analysis fell short was in underestimating Damac's ability to convert their superiority into multiple goals. Their season average of 0.69 goals per match suggested a side capable of control but not clinical finishing, yet they managed two well-taken finishes when it mattered. Al Okhdood's blank—their third in five encounters with Damac—extended a damning trend but offered little surprise given the quality differential on display. The result leaves both teams where they began in terms of league position, though Damac's performance suggests they possess more than their modest season statistics indicate.

Predictions are for information and entertainment only — not financial advice. 18+. Gambling can be addictive. BeGambleAware.org.