← Home
Fixtures  ›  Championship  ›  Wrexham
Championship

Wrexham Predictions

AI-powered match predictions, accuracy tracking, and bookmaker consensus comparisons.

Total Predictions
9
0 upcoming · 9 settled
Result Accuracy
33%
3 / 9 correct
BTTS Hit Rate
78%
7 / 9 calls
Over 2.5 Hit Rate
67%
6 / 9 calls

📊 Past Predictions (latest 9)

Sat 2 May 2026
2–3
2–2

Wrexham and Middlesbrough served up a competitive draw that defied expectations, with both sides trading blows across an eventful first half before settling into a stalemate. Tommy Conway's fourth-minute opener gave Boro an early advantage, but Wrexham responded through James Windass's 28th-minute leveller and a Sam Smith goal two minutes before half-time—the latter capitalizing on Ilias Kabore's assist to flip the script entirely. Middlesbrough equalized through Duane Strelec's 44th-minute strike, assisted by Matt Targett, leaving the sides locked at 2-2 heading into the interval and the second period producing no further goals.

Our model predicted a 2-3 scoreline favoring Middlesbrough with 60% win probability, missing both the result direction and the exact score. The prediction underestimated Wrexham's resilience at home and overestimated Boro's ability to convert their underlying advantage into a decisive win. We correctly flagged both-teams-to-score as likely and the over 2.5 threshold, with four goals ultimately arriving by half-time. Middlesbrough's superior xG and form metrics were evident in their early pressure and tactical discipline, yet our motivation analysis—emphasizing Boro's promotion hunt against Wrexham's mid-table position—failed to account for the hosts' capacity to compete when required. The draw reflects a more balanced contest than our 60-40 split suggested, a reminder that Championship football remains unpredictable despite strong underlying data.

Sun 26 Apr 2026
3–1
3–1

Coventry made their title credentials shine with a commanding 3-1 victory over Wrexham, securing the exact scoreline our model had predicted before kickoff. The match unfolded much as anticipated, with the hosts establishing early control through B. Thomas-Asante's 19th-minute opener, assisted by E. Mason-Clark. Wrexham briefly threatened to disrupt the script when O. Rathbone levelled just six minutes later, but Coventry's superior quality and motivation eventually proved decisive. V. Torp restored the home side's advantage in the 80th minute before Mason-Clark sealed the result with a late goal, reflecting the kind of clinical finishing that has defined Coventry's recent home performances.

Our pre-match analysis had flagged several factors that shaped the outcome. Coventry's exceptional home form—five wins from their last six matches with averaging over three goals per game—provided clear evidence of their goal-scoring capability. The prediction also weighted Wrexham's poor away record and mid-table position, which would typically correlate with limited attacking threat, though their ability to score in this fixture validated the Both Teams to Score backing that the data suggested. The high-scoring nature of recent H2H meetings, averaging 4.7 goals, manifested in the Over 2.5 coming in comfortably, supported by Coventry's home xG of 3.47.

The 3-1 scoreline demonstrated that the model's Poisson-based projection proved more accurate than SportsMole's 2-2 prediction, correctly identifying both the correct outcome and the precise margin. Coventry's position at the top of the table and Wrexham's mid-season plateau created the asymmetry in motivation that proved decisive on the pitch.

Tue 21 Apr 2026
1–1
0–1

Wrexham's James Windass broke the deadlock in the 40th minute with a clinical finish from a Sam Smith assist, and that single goal proved decisive at the Kassam Stadium. Oxford United pressed for an equalizer throughout the second half but couldn't find a way through, leaving Wrexham to secure a valuable away victory. The 1-0 scoreline handed the visitors three points in a contest that ultimately turned on a moment of incisive finishing.

Our model predicted a 1-1 draw with no win probability assigned to either side, meaning we called neither the result direction nor the final score. The prediction missed the outcome in a straightforward sense—Wrexham won rather than the draw we'd modeled. Without an equalizer emerging in the second period, Oxford's attacking efforts fell short, and what appeared an even contest in our analysis split decisively in Wrexham's favor. This represents a clear miss for the model, one that reflects either the difficulty of separating these sides in pre-match assessment or an underestimation of Wrexham's clinical efficiency in front of goal on the day.

The loss leaves Oxford without points from a match where the underlying play may have suggested a more even distribution of chances, but football ultimately rewards conversion over chances created. Wrexham's composure in the first half—epitomized by Windass's 40th-minute finish—gave them the margin they needed, and Oxford's failure to breach Wrexham's defense in the second period determined the final outcome. It's a reminder that prediction models must contend with the inherent variance of individual moments, particularly in low-scoring matches where one goal can define an entire contest.

Sat 18 Apr 2026
1–0
2–0

Wrexham produced a clinical first-half performance to dispatch Stoke City 2-0, with James Windass proving the decisive force in a two-goal burst that settled the contest inside 33 minutes. Windass opened the scoring in the 31st minute following a setup from G. Thomason, then doubled his tally just two minutes later to leave Stoke with a mountain to climb. The visiting side offered little resistance in the opening period, and Wrexham's early dominance proved sufficient to secure all three points.

Our model predicted a narrow 1-0 victory for Wrexham, correctly identifying the direction of the result but underestimating the hosts' attacking potency on the day. The prediction captured the fundamental dynamic—that Wrexham would control proceedings and find the breakthrough—yet missed the additional goal that separated the teams. Windass's quick-fire double in the opening half-hour demonstrated a level of clinical finishing that our scoring forecast had not fully accounted for, even as we'd backed the home side to emerge as victors. Stoke City's failure to register a response meant the match remained straightforward after the early exchanges, with Wrexham comfortably managing what became a one-sided affair.

Sun 12 Apr 2026
1–1
2–0

Birmingham secured a commanding 2-0 victory over Wrexham at St. Andrew's, with second-half goals from C. Vicente and C. Klarer putting the contest beyond doubt. Vicente's strike on 48 minutes, assisted by K. Wagner immediately after the interval, set the tone for Birmingham's dominance. Klarer added a second in the 71st minute through a Paik Seung-Ho assist, cementing a professional performance that left little room for Wrexham to mount a comeback.

Our model predicted a 1-1 draw with zero win probability assigned to either side, a significant miss on both the result direction and final scoreline. The prediction failed to account for Birmingham's attacking potency in the second half and underestimated their ability to break down a Wrexham defence that ultimately proved vulnerable to sustained pressure. While a draw remained plausible given the pre-match indicators, the visitors' inability to generate attacking threat—combined with Birmingham's clinical finishing—created a wider gap between prediction and reality than our model anticipated.

This result represents a clear forecasting error. The margin of victory and the nature of goals conceded suggest Birmingham held a clearer advantage than our probability distribution indicated. Post-match analysis will focus on identifying which underlying factors—whether possession metrics, shot quality, or defensive solidity—were misweighted in our pre-match assessment. Such recalibrations are essential to maintaining model integrity and transparency with our audience.

Tue 7 Apr 2026
2–1
1–5

Southampton delivered a ruthless display at the Racecourse Ground, dismantling Wrexham 5-1 in a result that bore little resemblance to the competitive encounter our model had anticipated. K. Matsuki's early opener in the 12th minute set the tone, with F. Downes doubling the advantage just ten minutes later. Wrexham pulled one back through J. Windass in the 34th minute to offer brief respite, but Southampton's quality proved decisive in the second half. C. Larin, R. Stewart, and F. Azaz added further goals to complete a dominant performance that exposed significant gaps between the two sides.

Our prediction of a 2-1 Wrexham victory missed the mark entirely. The pre-match analysis rested on Southampton's historical weakness away from St Mary's and Wrexham's typical home-ground effectiveness, both factors that simply did not materialize on the day. The visitors' attacking precision, particularly in the opening thirty minutes, rendered our expectation of defensive discipline and opportunism from set pieces irrelevant. Southampton instead controlled the narrative through open play, converting early possession into multiple quality chances rather than relying on the defensive resilience we'd identified as their likely path to a single goal.

The gap between prediction and reality here points to the limitations of pattern-based analysis when form, tactical execution, or individual performance variance diverges sharply from seasonal averages. While our framework flagged legitimate strategic considerations, Southampton's performance suggested a side operating at a level that transcended the typical dynamics we'd modeled for this fixture.

Fri 3 Apr 2026
1–1
2–2

West Brom and Wrexham served up a compelling Championship encounter that vindicated our pre-match assessment of a draw, though the actual scoreline—2-2—proved more eventful than the 1-1 we'd predicted. The match swung decisively in West Brom's favor early, with Ismael Price breaking the deadlock in the 26th minute before Jed Maja doubled the hosts' advantage from the penalty spot just before half-time. At that point, a West Brom victory looked assured. However, Wrexham's second-half response demonstrated precisely the kind of attacking resilience our analysis had identified. James Windass pulled one back in the 47th minute with an assist from Luke O'Brien, then Gareth Dobson completed the turnaround four minutes later as O'Brien again proved instrumental. The comeback forced West Brom to chase the game rather than control it, ultimately leaving both sides unable to find a winner.

Our model correctly predicted the result direction—a draw—but missed the elevated goal tally by predicting a tighter 1-1 scoreline. The balanced attacking threat we'd flagged in our pre-match context did materialize, with both teams creating sufficient chances to score. The narrative arc, however, exposed a nuance our prediction didn't fully capture: West Brom's early dominance gave them a commanding position, yet Wrexham's organizational discipline in the second half allowed them to recover from a two-goal deficit. The draw ultimately reflects the competitive equilibrium between these sides, though the goal sequence reveals how volatile the contest proved in execution despite the equilibrium in probabilities.

Sat 21 Mar 2026
1–1
1–2

Wrexham's 2-1 victory over Sheffield United showcased the visiting side's ability to capitalize on moments of vulnerability, overturning an early deficit to claim all three points. Anthony Brooks gave Sheffield United the lead in the 49th minute, seemingly positioning the hosts to control the contest. Yet Wrexham responded swiftly through a well-constructed equalizer just five minutes later, with James Windass finishing after being set up by Shaun Smith. The decisive moment came in the 78th minute when Smith himself converted, converting what appears to have been a buildup through Ibrhaima Kabore to secure Wrexham's upset win.

Our model's prediction of a 1-1 draw proved incorrect on both the final scoreline and result direction. We had anticipated Sheffield United would dominate possession and chance creation without sufficient clinical finishing, while Wrexham remained organized and dangerous on the counter. The actual match confirmed part of this framework—Wrexham did indeed demonstrate defensive discipline and capitalize efficiently—but the outcome diverged significantly. Rather than struggling to break through, Wrexham found their goals and crucially didn't concede again after Brooks' opener. Sheffield United's early strike suggested they might build momentum, yet they failed to extend their advantage when the opportunity presented itself.

The lesson here speaks to the evolving competitive reality in the Championship. While squad depth and experience remain relevant factors, promoted sides like Wrexham increasingly carry sufficient quality to punish established opponents through clinical execution and tactical cohesion. Our prediction underestimated Wrexham's threat in transition and overestimated Sheffield United's ability to convert dominance into goals, reflecting the tightening margins at this level.

Tue 17 Mar 2026
1–1
3–1

Watford dominated Wrexham in a comprehensive 3-1 victory at Vicarage Road, with the home side's clinical finishing proving decisive in the Championship clash. Moises Bola broke the deadlock in the 18th minute with an assist from Giorgi Chakvetadze, before Edo Kayembe doubled the advantage just before the interval courtesy of Ilias Irankunda's play. Though Wrexham offered resistance with Matt Cleworth's 49th-minute goal pulling one back, Watford's third through Edo Bove in the 90th minute sealed a commanding performance that never truly wavered from its opening dominance.

Our model predicted a 1-1 draw, assigning zero win probability to either side—a forecast that proved considerably wide of the mark. The prediction rested on an assumption of balanced attacking threat and comparable defensive frailty, a narrative that the match's opening thirty minutes quickly undermined. While Wrexham's visiting status and recent promotion did suggest competitive credentials, Watford's control and conversion rate exceeded what our pre-match analysis factored in. The early goals from Bola and Kayembe were not the product of a particularly chaotic spell but rather composed finishing from a side that created clear-cut opportunities and took them.

The prediction's failure speaks to underestimating Watford's ability to impose their rhythm on a promoted side, even one with investment and ambition. Though Wrexham responded credibly with Cleworth's goal, they never threatened a genuine comeback, and Watford's late third goal reflected the fixture's true complexion rather than a dramatic shift in momentum. This represents a clear miss for our model's initial assessment.

Predictions are for information and entertainment only — not financial advice. 18+. Gambling can be addictive. BeGambleAware.org.