← Home
Fixtures  ›  Eredivisie  ›  Heracles
Eredivisie

Heracles Predictions

AI-powered match predictions, accuracy tracking, and bookmaker consensus comparisons.

Total Predictions
5
0 upcoming · 5 settled
Result Accuracy
80%
4 / 5 correct
BTTS Hit Rate
20%
1 / 5 calls
Over 2.5 Hit Rate
60%
3 / 5 calls

📊 Past Predictions (latest 5)

Sun 17 May 2026
0–2
1–2
Sun 10 May 2026
2–0
3–0

Telstar's 3-0 victory over visiting Heracles unfolded in a decisive second-half sequence that ultimately vindicated our directional call but underestimated the hosts' attacking potential. After a controlled first 70 minutes, the match ignited when G. Offerhaus broke the deadlock in the 70th minute. Two minutes later, T. Noslin doubled the lead with a well-constructed team move finished via P. Brouwer's assist, and Telstar's dominance crystallized when Hardeveld added a third in the 77th, with Noslin providing the supply again. The sequence revealed a sharper attacking edge than our pre-match analysis had anticipated, suggesting Heracles' defensive structure deteriorated faster than the underlying patterns we'd studied typically suggest.

Our model predicted a 2-0 scoreline with the confidence that Telstar's home solidity and Heracles' road struggles would produce a controlled, low-margin win. The result direction proved accurate—Telstar's victory was never in doubt—but the final margin exposed a gap in our assessment. The defensive vulnerabilities Heracles exhibited, particularly in transition and from set-play sequences, proved more pronounced than historical samples indicated. Our flagged factors held true: a well-prepared home side did limit their visitor's creative outlets and scored efficiently on the counter. However, the third goal suggested Heracles lost structural discipline once trailing, rather than maintaining the compact shape that might have contained the scoreline to our predicted 2-0.

The late red card to Luka Kulenović in the 90+2nd minute served as a punctuation mark on a performance where the visitors simply ran out of answers. Telstar's execution in the second half, particularly through Noslin's attacking contributions, proved the decisive difference in a match where our defensive framework was sound but our offensive forecasting proved conservative.

Sun 26 Apr 2026
1–1
0–2

FC Volendam delivered a decisive performance at the Kyocera Stadium, securing a 2-0 victory that proved far more comfortable than our pre-match model anticipated. Adrián Descotte broke the deadlock in the 55th minute, and after Volendam's pressure mounted, Romain Muhren added a second in the 62nd minute through the assist of Bram Kuwas. The visiting side's clinical finishing in the second half completely overturned a prediction that heavily favored a stalemate.

Our model predicted 1-1 with Heracles given a 52% probability of winning, a forecast that missed the fundamental direction of the result. The miscalculation appears rooted in our weighting of Heracles' home advantage and apparent desperation—the club sitting 18th with everything to play for—against Volendam's historical struggles on the road. While the data correctly identified Heracles' defensive fragility (2.9 goals conceded per game) and Volendam's relative solidity (1.68 conceded), we underestimated Volendam's ability to capitalize on limited chances away from home. The prediction also leaned on Both Teams to Score given the historical head-to-head pattern of high-scoring affairs, but Volendam's defensive discipline ensured that Heracles barely threatened the goal.

The scoreline ultimately reflected a gap between the teams that our pre-match analysis underestimated. Volendam's second-half efficiency neutralized Heracles' home urgency, suggesting that form and recent shape trumped the contextual pressure we'd flagged. This represents a clear miss on the model's part—a reminder that situational desperation doesn't always translate to improved performance on the pitch.

Sat 11 Apr 2026
1–2
0–3

Ajax dominated Heracles with a convincing 3-0 victory at the Stadion de Goffert. The visitors struck with remarkable efficiency in the opening stages, with Mika Godts breaking the deadlock in the 16th minute courtesy of a Julian Mokio assist, before Sergiño Berghuis doubled the lead just sixty seconds later after collecting a pass from Wout Weghorst. Ajax's superiority was already evident by halftime, and Berghuis added a third in the 47th minute following setup play from Oded Gloukh. The only blemish on an otherwise professional performance came when Takehiro Tomiyasu received a red card in the 79th minute, but by then the result was thoroughly settled.

Our model predicted a 1-2 scoreline in Ajax's favor, correctly identifying the winner but missing the magnitude of their dominance. The prediction captured the directional outcome, yet underestimated both Ajax's attacking potency and Heracles' vulnerability in defense. The rapid-fire nature of Ajax's opening quarter-hour—two goals in as many minutes—suggested a gulf in class that our pre-match assessment hadn't fully accounted for. While the predicted margin proved too tight, the core finding held: Ajax's superior resources and form proved decisive against a Heracles side unable to generate meaningful resistance.

The efficiency of Ajax's finishing and the control they exerted throughout gives substance to their status as favorites, even if the exact arithmetic of the victory differed from forecasts. This was a performance that underlined clear hierarchies in the Eredivisie.

Sun 5 Apr 2026
3–0
4–1

Heerenveen's 4-1 demolition of Heracles on Saturday delivered the dominant home performance our model anticipated, though the execution proved more ruthless than the predicted 3-0 scoreline suggested. An early Engels goal handed Heracles a shock lead in the 21st minute, but the hosts responded with clinical efficiency. Trenskow equalized in the 35th minute, and by halftime Heerenveen had seized control through Nordas's penalty conversion. The second half saw the home side extend their advantage with an own goal from Pasveer in the 47th minute, before Rivera added a fifth attacking contribution in the 51st minute to confirm a comprehensive victory.

Our prediction correctly identified Heerenveen's superiority and the likely outcome, capturing the essential narrative that the stronger team would dominate a mid-table away side. The factors we'd highlighted—Heerenveen's home command and Heracles's vulnerability in away fixtures—proved decisive. However, we underestimated the margin by one goal. The early Engels strike punctured our clean sheet expectation, suggesting Heracles showed more initial threat than typical defensive patterns might have indicated. The subsequent goals came at a quicker pace than the distributed conversion we'd flagged, with three arriving within the opening 51 minutes.

This result reinforces Heerenveen's credentials as a top-half force when playing at home, even if our model slightly miscalibrated the exact scoreline. Heracles's early goal proved a brief interruption rather than evidence of a competitive contest, and the hosts' response demonstrated the clinical finishing required to turn territorial advantage into substantial points.

Predictions are for information and entertainment only — not financial advice. 18+. Gambling can be addictive. BeGambleAware.org.