Belgium Predictions
AI-powered match predictions, accuracy tracking, and bookmaker consensus comparisons.
📅 Upcoming Fixtures
📊 Past Predictions (latest 8)
Belgium and Senegal served up a dramatic finish to a match that swung wildly in both directions. Senegal came out swinging and took control early, with H. Diarra putting them ahead in the 25th minute. They doubled their advantage after the break when I. Sarr made it 2-0 in the 51st minute, assisted by M. Niakhate, and looked well on course to pull off a shock result. But Belgium clawed their way back into it. R. Lukaku scored in the 86th minute with help from T. Meunier to set up a tense finale, and Y. Tielemans levelled things in the 89th to force extra time. Tielemans then sealed it from the penalty spot deep into the additional period, giving Belgium a 3-2 win.
Our model predicted a 2-1 scoreline with Belgium favoured at 43% to win, though a draw sat at 30% — a fair margin of plausible outcomes rather than a confident call. The actual result came in at 3-2 to Belgium, so we got the direction right but missed the exact score. Before kickoff, the model leaned on Belgium's solid home form and defensive record against Senegal's patchy away results, but hadn't fully accounted for how open this knockout tie would turn out. What unfolded was a far more chaotic and goal-heavy affair than the baseline lean suggested, with both sides finding the net freely and the match decided only by a late penalty in extra time.
Belgium swept past New Zealand with a commanding 5-1 victory in a one-sided World Cup encounter. Trossard opened the scoring in the 28th minute and doubled his tally just after the break, assisted by Vanaken, before De Bruyne added a third in the 66th. New Zealand grabbed a consolation through Just in the 84th minute, but Belgium wrapped it up with two late finishes—Lukaku converting in the 86th with help from Raskin, then Saelemaekers sealing it in stoppage time from Lukaku's assist.
Our model called the direction correctly but badly misjudged the scale. We'd pegged Belgium as the likely winners at 72 percent probability and predicted a tight 0-1 scoreline, banking heavily on a low-scoring encounter. What actually unfolded was a proper rout. The early stages looked like they might track our thinking—level at 22 minutes with limited clear-cut chances—but Belgium's quality in the final third proved far sharper than the pre-match projections suggested. By halftime, they were already two up, and New Zealand couldn't close the gap despite briefly getting on the board late on.
The miss here wasn't about calling the winner wrong; it was about sizing the margin. Our model weighted a tight game, and that simply didn't materialize. Belgium's attacking depth and composure in front of goal punished New Zealand in ways the live xG readings didn't anticipate. It's a reminder that scoreline predictions are inherently tricky—nailing the outcome is one thing, but the final tally often tells a different story than the underlying numbers suggest going in.
Belgium and Iran played out a goalless draw in a World Cup group-stage clash that defied pre-match expectations for an open, attacking contest. The match remained scoreless throughout, though Belgium's task grew substantially harder when N. Ngoy was sent off in the 66th minute, reducing the designated home side to ten men for the final stretch. Neither team managed to break the deadlock despite the high stakes of group-stage football, where both sides arrived with clear motivation to secure a positive result.
Our model predicted a 2-1 Belgium victory before kickoff, assigning a 55% win probability to Belgium and just 22% to a draw. The goalless outcome fell well outside the model's primary lean, which had weighted a more attacking, open match. That forecast rested on Belgium's full squad fitness and recent momentum against Iran's strong recent form, which included goals in four of their last five outings. The red card to Ngoy at the hour mark altered the tactical shape considerably, but the prediction's emphasis on attacking potential did not align with how the match actually unfolded. This represents a clear miss for the model, which had not anticipated such a cautious, low-scoring outcome despite the tournament pressure and group-stage urgency facing both sides.
Belgium and Egypt played out a 1-1 draw in their World Cup group-stage encounter, a result that defied our pre-match prediction of a 3-1 Belgian victory. Egypt struck first through Ashour in the 19th minute, assisted by Salah, before Belgium equalized through an own goal by Hany in the 66th minute. The draw leaves both sides level on points in an early tournament setting where neither team could establish clear control.
Our model assigned the draw only a 14% probability before kickoff, having favored Belgium heavily at 77% to win. The prediction rested on Belgium's recent form—three wins and a draw with over two goals scored per game—and their elite defensive record, contrasted against Egypt's inconsistent performances and limited attacking threat away from home. Those underlying shape indicators suggested a comfortable Belgian victory. Instead, Egypt proved more resilient and dangerous than the pre-match metrics anticipated, while Belgium failed to convert their expected dominance into goals. The own goal compounded what was already a significant departure from forecast.
The mismatch between prediction and outcome serves as a reminder that tournament football, especially early in group play, contains considerable variance. Egypt's defensive organization and set-piece threat proved sufficient to frustrate a superior Belgian side, even if the underlying performance metrics suggested a one-sided affair was more likely. Both teams will regroup knowing a draw keeps their knockout hopes alive, though it represents a missed opportunity for Belgium to establish clear separation.